4.1 Article

Screening of new strains of Saccharomycodes ludwigii and Zygosaccharomyces rouxii to produce low-alcohol beer

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE INSTITUTE OF BREWING
Volume 121, Issue 1, Pages 113-121

Publisher

INST BREWING
DOI: 10.1002/jib.185

Keywords

Saccharomycodes ludwigii; Zygosaccharomyces rouxii; gas-chromatography/mass-spectrometry; volatile profile; principal component analysis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Low-alcohol beer (0.5-1.2% v/v ethanol) is a less common brewing industry output than standard beer but there is an increasing interest in this product, as evidenced by increased attention to health and safety and government policies on alcohol and diet. The main challenge in the production of low-alcohol beer is the achievement of a product as similar as possible to regular beer, particularly concerning the content of the volatile compounds. These compounds can be lost during the physical removal of alcohol by dialysis, reverse osmosis and vacuum rectification. Consequently, an alternative technique is the use of biological methods, which involve the employment of non-conventional yeasts. In this paper, 11 non-conventional yeast strains were tested for low-alcohol beer production. The strains used belonged to two different species: Saccharomycodes ludwigii and Zygosaccharomyces rouxii. The beer samples produced by these strains were analysed for their ethanol content and main volatile compounds. The S. ludwigii strains were more suitable for brewing low-alcohol beer, especially strain DBVPG 3010, which also showed a higher content of esters and a lower amount of diacetyl compared with previous reports. The Z. rouxii strains produced an ethanol and diacetyl content above the taste threshold. This screening project can be considered as a first step towards the production of low-alcohol beer by means of new selected non-conventional yeasts. Copyright (C) 2015 The Institute of Brewing & Distilling

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available