4.5 Article

Mutant p62/SQSTM1 UBA domains linked to Paget's disease of bone differ in their abilities to function as stabilization signals

Journal

FEBS LETTERS
Volume 584, Issue 8, Pages 1585-1590

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1016/j.febslet.2010.03.018

Keywords

Ubiquitin; Proteasome; Ubiquitin binding domain; Stabilization signal; Paget's disease of bone; Sequestosome-1; Rad23

Funding

  1. Swedish Research Council (NPD)
  2. Swedish Cancer Society (NPD)
  3. Nordic Center of Excellence Neurodegeneration (NPD)
  4. European Community Network of Excellence RUBICON [LSHCCT-2005-018683]
  5. Wenner-Gren Foundation (CB)
  6. Foundation of Geriatric Diseases (CB)
  7. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (JL)
  8. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (TPG)
  9. School of Chemistry at Nottingham (TPG)
  10. National Association for the Relief of Paget's Disease and Arthritis Research Campaign (RL)
  11. MRC [G0300413] Funding Source: UKRI
  12. Medical Research Council [G0300413] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We show that the ubiquitin-associated domain (UBA) of human p62/sequestosome-1 (SQSTM1) can delay degradation of proteasome substrates in yeast. Taking advantage of naturally occurring mutant UBA domains that are linked to Paget's disease of bone (PDB), we found that three of the four mutant UBA domains tested in this study were able to inhibit proteasomal degradation, albeit not to the same extent as the wild-type domain. Interestingly, the stability measured as the fraction of folded protein, and not the ubiquitin binding properties, of the PDB-associated UBA domains correlated with their protective effects. These data suggest that the protective effect of UBA domains depends on their structural integrity rather than ubiquitin binding capabilities. (C) 2010 Federation of European Biochemical Societies. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available