4.5 Article

Polo-like kinase-1 phosphorylates MDM2 at Ser260 and stimulates MDM2-mediated p53 turnover

Journal

FEBS LETTERS
Volume 583, Issue 22, Pages 3543-3548

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1016/j.febslet.2009.09.057

Keywords

p53; Murne double-minute clone 2; Polo-like kinase-1; Phosphorylation

Funding

  1. Cancer Research UK

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The E3 ubiqutin ligase, murne double-minute clone 2 (MDM2), promotes the degradation of p53 under normal homeostatic conditions. Several serine residues within the acidic domain of MDM2 are phosphorylated to maintain its activity but become hypo-phosphorylated following DNA damage, leading to inactivation of MDM2 and induction of p53. However, the signalling pathways that mediate these phosphorylation events are not fully understood. Here we show that the oncogenic and cell cycle-regulatory protein kinase, polo-like kinase-1 (PLK1), phosphorylates MDM2 at one of these residues, Ser260, and stimulates MDM2-mediated turnover of p53. These data are consistent with the idea that deregulation of PLK1 during tumourigenesis may help suppress p53 function. Structured summary: MINT-7266353: MDM2 (uniprotkb:Q00987) physically interacts (MI:0915) with PLK1 (uniprotkb:P53350) by pull down (MI:0096) MINT-7266344, MINT-7266329: MDM2 (uniprotkb:Q00987) physically interacts (MI:0915) with PLK1 (uniprotkb:P53350) by anti bait coimmunoprecipitation (MI:0006) MINT-7266250: PLK1 (uniprotkb:P53350) phosphorylates (MI:0217) p53 (uniprotkb:P04637) by protein kinase assay (MI:0424) MINT-7266241, MINT-7266318: PLK1 (uniprotkb:P53350) phosphorylates (MI:0217) MDM2 (uniprotkb:P23804) by protein kinase assay (MI:0424) MINT-7266231, MINT-7266805, MINT-7266264, MINT-7266299: PLK1 (uniprotkb:P53350) phosphorylates (MI:0217) MDM2 (uniprotkb:Q00987) by protein kinase assay (MI:0424) (C) 2009 Published by Elsevier B. V. on behalf of the Federation of European Biochemical Societies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available