4.6 Review

Dynamic protein ligand interactions - insights from MS

Journal

FEBS JOURNAL
Volume 281, Issue 8, Pages 1950-1964

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/febs.12707

Keywords

crosslinking; hydrogen-deuterium exchange; hydroxyl radical footprinting; MS; protein complexes; protein-ligand interactions; proteomics

Funding

  1. Wellcome Trust
  2. PROSPECTS grant within the Research Framework of the European Union [HEALTHF4-2008-201648]
  3. Royal Society
  4. ERC investigator award (IMPRESS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Proteins undergo dynamic interactions with carbohydrates, lipids and nucleotides to form catalytic cores, fine-tuned for different cellular actions. The study of dynamic interactions between proteins and their cognate ligands is therefore fundamental to the understanding of biological systems. During the last two decades MS, and its associated techniques, has become accepted as a method for the study of protein-ligand interactions, not only for covalent complexes, where the use of MS is well established, but also, and significantly for protein-ligand interactions, for noncovalent assemblies. In this review, we employ a broad definition of a ligand to encompass protein subunits, drug molecules, oligonucleotides, carbohydrates, and lipids. Under the appropriate conditions, MS can reveal the composition, heterogeneity and dynamics of these protein-ligand interactions, and in some cases their structural arrangements and binding affinities. Herein, we highlight MS approaches for studying protein-ligand complexes, including those containing integral membrane subunits, and showcase examples from recent literature. Specifically, we tabulate the myriad of methodologies, including hydrogen exchange, proteomics, hydroxyl radical footprinting, intact complexes, and crosslinking, which, when combined with MS, provide insights into conformational changes and subtle modifications in response to ligand-binding interactions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available