4.6 Article

MicroRNA-182 targets cAMP-responsive element-binding protein 1 and suppresses cell growth in human gastric adenocarcinoma

Journal

FEBS JOURNAL
Volume 279, Issue 7, Pages 1252-1260

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2012.08519.x

Keywords

cell growth; CREB1; gastric adenocarcinoma; miR-182; miRNA

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30873017, 91029714, 31071191]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Tianjin [08JCZDJC23300, 09JCZDJC17500]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) constitute a class of noncoding RNAs that post-transcriptionally regulate gene expression. Recent evidence indicates that many miRNAs function as oncogenes or tumor suppressors by negatively regulating their target genes. In our previous study, using miRNA microarray analysis, we found that miRNA-182 (miR-182) was significantly downregulated in human gastric adenocarcinoma tissue samples. Here, we confirmed the downregulation of miR-182 in a larger sample of gastric tissue samples. Overexpression of miR-182 suppressed the proliferation and colony formation of gastric cancer cells. An oncogene, encoding cAMP-responsive element binding protein 1 (CREB1), serves as a direct target gene of miR-182. A fluorescent reporter assay confirmed that miR-182 binds specifically to the predicted site of the CREB1 mRNA 3'-UTR. When miR-182 was overexpressed in gastric cancer cell lines, both the mRNA and protein levels of CREB1 were depressed. Furthermore, CREB1 was present at a high level in human gastric adenocarcinoma tissues, and this was inversely correlated with miR-182 expression. Ectopic expression of CREB1 overcame the suppressive phenotypes of gastric cancer cells caused by miR-182. These results indicate that miR-182 targets the CREB1 gene and suppresses gastric adenocarcinoma cell growth, suggesting that miR-182 shows tumor-suppressive activity in human gastric cancer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available