4.6 Article

D-strand perturbation and amyloid propensity in beta-2 microglobulin

Journal

FEBS JOURNAL
Volume 278, Issue 13, Pages 2349-2358

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2011.08157.x

Keywords

amyloidosis; beta-2 microglobulin; beta-buldge; dialysis related amyloidosis; MHC I; proline

Funding

  1. Fondazione Cariplo, Milano, Italy
  2. Italian MIUR [RBLA03B3KC_005]
  3. EU
  4. FAR (Fondo Ateneo per la Ricerca)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Proteins hosting main beta-sheets adopt specific strategies to avoid intermolecular interactions leading to aggregation and amyloid deposition. Human beta-2 microglobulin (beta 2m) displays a typical immunoglobulin fold and is known to be amyloidogenic in vivo. Upon severe kidney deficiency, beta 2m accumulates in the bloodstream, triggering, over the years, pathological deposition of large amyloid aggregates in joints and bones. A beta-bulge observed on the edge D beta-strand of some beta 2m crystal structures has been suggested to be crucial in protecting the protein from amyloid aggregation. Conversely, a straight D-strand, observed in different crystal structures of monomeric beta 2m, could promote amyloid aggregation. More recently, the different conformations observed for the beta 2m D-strand have been interpreted as the result of intrinsic flexibility, rather than being assigned to a functional protective role against aggregation. To shed light on such contrasting picture, the mutation Asp53 -> Pro was engineered in beta 2m, aiming to impair the formation of a regular/straight D-strand. Such a mutant was characterized structurally and biophysically by CD, X-ray crystallography and MS, in addition to an assessment of its amyloid aggregation trends in vitro. The results reported in the present study highlight the conformational plasticity of the edge D-strand, and show that even perturbing the D-strand structure through a Pro residue has only marginal effects on protecting beta 2m from amyloid aggregation in vitro.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available