4.6 Article

ThermoFAD, a Thermofluor®-adapted flavin ad hoc detection system for protein folding and ligand binding

Journal

FEBS JOURNAL
Volume 276, Issue 10, Pages 2833-2840

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2009.07006.x

Keywords

flavin; fluorescence screening; ligand screening; protein stability; Thermofluor((R))

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science
  2. Fondazione Cariplo
  3. Italian Association for Cancer Research
  4. American Chemical Society Petroleum Research Fund [46271-C4]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In living organisms, genes encoding proteins that contain flavins as a prosthetic group constitute approximately 2-3% of the total. The fluorescence of flavin cofactors in these proteins is a property that is widely employed for biochemical characterisation. Here, we present a modified Thermofluor((R)) approach called ThermoFAD (Thermofluor((R))-adapted flavin ad hoc detection system), which simplifies identification of optimal purification and storage conditions as well as high-affinity ligands. In this technique, the flavin cofactor is used as an intrinsic probe to monitor protein folding and stability, taking advantage of the different fluorescent properties of flavin-containing proteins between the folded and denatured state. The main advantage of the method is that it allows a large amount of biochemical data to be obtained using very small amounts of protein sample and standard laboratory equipment. We have explored several cases that demonstrate the reliability and versatility of this technique when applied to globular flavoenzymes, membrane-anchored flavoproteins, and macromolecular complexes. The information gathered from ThermoFAD analysis can be very valuable for any biochemical and biophysical analysis, including crystallisation. The method is likely to be applicable to other classes of proteins that possess endogenous fluorescent cofactors and prosthetic groups.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available