4.6 Review

Protein tyrosine phosphatases: structure-function relationships

Journal

FEBS JOURNAL
Volume 275, Issue 5, Pages 867-882

Publisher

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2008.06251.x

Keywords

catalytic mechanism; cell adhesion; cell signalling; drug design; ligand binding; NMR; phosphatase inhibitor; protein structure; protein tyrosine phosphatase; structure-function receptor; X-ray crystallography

Funding

  1. MRC [G0700232] Funding Source: UKRI
  2. Medical Research Council [G0700232] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Structural analysis of protein tyrosine phosphatases (PTPs) has expanded considerably in the last several years, producing more than 200 structures in this class of enzymes (from 35 different proteins and their complexes with ligands). The small-medium size of the catalytic domain of similar to 280 residues plus a very compact fold makes it amenable to cloning and overexpression in bacterial systems thus facilitating crystallographic analysis. The low molecular weight PTPs being even smaller, similar to 150 residues, are also perfect targets for NMR analysis. The availability of different structures and complexes of PTPs with substrates and inhibitors has provided a wealth of information with profound effects in the way we understand their biological functions. Developments in mammalian expression technology recently led to the first crystal structure of a receptor-like PTP extracellular region. Altogether, the PTP structural work significantly advanced our knowledge regarding the architecture, regulation and substrate specificity of these enzymes. In this review, we compile the most prominent structural traits that characterize PTPs and their complexes with ligands. We discuss how the data can be used to design further functional experiments and as a basis for drug design given that many PTPs are now considered strategic therapeutic targets for human diseases such as diabetes and cancer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available