4.6 Article

Identification of preferred substrate sequences for transglutaminase 1-development of a novel peptide that can efficiently detect cross-linking enzyme activity in the skin

Journal

FEBS JOURNAL
Volume 275, Issue 22, Pages 5667-5677

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2008.06692.x

Keywords

epidermis; keratinocyte; phage display; skin; transglutaminase

Funding

  1. Cosmetology Foundation [19580103]
  2. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [186701]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Transglutaminase 1 (TGase 1) is an essential enzyme for cornified envelope formation in stratified squamous epithelia. This enzyme catalyzes the cross-linking of glutamine and lysine residues in structural proteins in differentiating keratinocytes. To gain insight into the preferred substrate structure of TGase 1, we used a phage-displayed random peptide library to screen primary amino acid sequences that are preferentially selected by human TGase 1. The peptides selected as glutamine donor substrate exhibited a marked tendency in primary structure, conforming to the sequence: QxK/R psi xxxWP (where x and psi represent non-conserved and hydrophobic amino acids, respectively). Using glutathione S-transferase (GST) fusion proteins of the selected peptides, we identified several sequences as preferred substrates and confirmed that they were isozyme-specific. We generated GST-fused alanine mutants of the most reactive sequence (K5) to determine the residues that were critical for reactivity. Even in peptide form, K5 appeared to have high and specific reactivity as substrate. In situ analysis of mouse skin sections using fluorescence-conjugated K5 peptide resulted in detection of TGase 1 activity with high sensitivity, but no signal was detected in a TGase 1-null mouse. In conclusion, we were successful in generating a novel substrate peptide for sensitive detection of endogenous TGase 1 activity in the skin.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available