4.7 Article

Upregulation of proteasome activity in muscle RING finger 1-null mice following denervation

Journal

FASEB JOURNAL
Volume 26, Issue 7, Pages 2986-2999

Publisher

FEDERATION AMER SOC EXP BIOL
DOI: 10.1096/fj.12-204495

Keywords

E3 ubiquitin ligase; ubiquitin proteasome system; MAFbx; muscle atrophy

Funding

  1. Muscular Dystrophy Association
  2. U.S. National Institutes of Health [DK75801, HL096819]
  3. Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  4. Kirchstein National Research Service Award

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Deletion of muscle RING finger 1 (MuRF1), an E3 ubiquitin ligase, leads to sparing of muscle mass following denervation. The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that muscle sparing in mice with a deletion of MuRF1 is due to the selective inhibition of the ubiquitin proteasome system. Activities of the 20S and 26S proteasomes, calpain and cathepsin L, were measured in the triceps surae muscles of wild-type (WT) and MuRF1-knockout (KO) mice at 3 and 14 d following denervation. In addition, fractional protein synthesis rates and differential gene expression were measured in WT and KO muscle. The major finding was that 20S and 26S proteasome activities were significantly elevated (1.5- to 2.5-fold) after 14 d of denervation in both WT and KO mice relative to control, but interestingly, the activities of both the 20S and 26S proteasome were significantly higher in KO than WT mice. Further, mRNA expression of MAFbx was elevated after 14 d of denervation in KO, but not WT, mice. These data challenge the conventional dogma that MuRF1 is controlling the degradation of only contractile proteins and suggest a role for MuRF1 in the global control of the ubiquitin proteasome system and protein turnover.-Gomes, A. V., Waddell, D. S., Siu, R., Stein, M., Dewey, S., Furlow, J. D., Bodine, S. C. Upregulation of proteasome activity in muscle RING finger 1-null mice following denervation. FASEB J. 26, 2986-2999 (2012). www.fasebj.org

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available