4.7 Review

Naturally occurring regulatory T cells: markers, mechanisms, and manipulation

Journal

FASEB JOURNAL
Volume 26, Issue 6, Pages 2253-2276

Publisher

FEDERATION AMER SOC EXP BIOL
DOI: 10.1096/fj.11-193672

Keywords

FOXP3; immunomodulation; tolerance

Funding

  1. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [SFB F1816-B13, SFB F4609-B19]
  2. Christian Doppler Laboratory for Immunomodulation, Christian Doppler Society

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Naturally occurring CD4(+)CD25(high) fork-Head box protein 3 (FOXP3)(+) regulatory T cells (nTregs) are key mediators of immunity, which orchestrate and maintain tolerance to self and foreign antigens. In the recent 1.5 decades, a multitude of studies have aimed to define the phenotype and function of nTregs and to assess their therapeutic potential for modulating immune mediated disorders such as auto-immunity, allergy, and episodes of transplant rejection. In this review, we summarize the current knowledge on the biology of nTregs. We address the exact definition of nTregs by specific markers and combinations thereof, which is a prerequisite for the state-of-the-art isolation of defined nTreg populations. Furthermore, we discuss the mechanism by which nTregs mediate immunosuppression and how this knowledge might translate into novel therapeutic modalities. With first clinical studies of nTreg-based therapies being finished, questions concerning the reliable sources of nTregs arebecoming more and more eminent. Consequently, approaches allowing conversion of CD4(+) T cells into nTregs by coculture with antigen-presenting cells, cytokines, and/or pharmacological agents are discussed. In addition, genetic engineering approaches for the generation of antigen-specific nTregs are described.-Schmetterer, K. G., Neunkirchner, A., Pickl, W. F. Naturally occurring regulatory T cells: markers, mechanisms, and manipulation. FASEB J. 26, 2253-2276 (2012). www.fasebj.org

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available