4.7 Article

Gender specificity of altered human immune cytokine profiles in aging

Journal

FASEB JOURNAL
Volume 24, Issue 9, Pages 3580-3589

Publisher

FEDERATION AMER SOC EXP BIOL
DOI: 10.1096/fj.10-160911

Keywords

T cells; monocytes; immunodeficiency; autoimmunity

Funding

  1. National Institute on Aging
  2. Kenneth Rainin Foundation
  3. National Institutes of Health [HL31809]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cytokine generation by T cells and monocytes was determined for 50 subjects aged 65 yr or older and concurrently studied young subjects individually matched to each old subject for sex, race, and national origin. Highly significant differences between cytokine levels of old and young subjects all were gender specific. For T cells stimulated with anti-CD3 plus anti-CD28 antibodies, mean ratios of IFN-gamma generation for healthy old to young subjects were 0.22 for men (P<0.001; n=15) and 3.35 for women (P<0.001; n=13), and those of IL-17 were 0.30 for men (P<0.001) and no difference for women. CD8 T cells were the source of high IFN-gamma in healthy old women. For old men with an inflammatory or immune disease (n=10), mean old to young ratios of T-cell-generated IFN-gamma and IL-17 increased with disease severity up to 5.78 and 2.97 (both P<0.01), respectively, without changes for old women with similar diseases (n=12). For differentiated LPS-stimulated monocytes, old to young ratios of TNF-alpha and IL-6 generation were high only in women with immune or inflammatory disease (2.38, P<0.05 and 1.62, P<0.01, respectively), whereas ratios of IFN-gamma-evoked IP-10 chemokine were low in all groups. Alterations in immune cytokine profiles with aging show significant gender specificity.-Goetzl, E. J., Huang, M.-C., Kon, J., Patel, K., Schwartz, J. B., Fast, K., Ferrucci, L., Madara, K., Taub, D. D., Longo, D. L. Gender specificity of altered human immune cytokine profiles in aging. FASEB J. 24, 3580-3589 (2010). www.fasebj.org

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available