4.2 Article

Mental health problems in undocumented and documented migrants: a survey study

Journal

FAMILY PRACTICE
Volume 31, Issue 5, Pages 571-577

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmu038

Keywords

General practice; health records; illegal migrants; mental health; migrants and transients; personal survey

Funding

  1. Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development ZonMW [200310014]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. Undocumented migrants (UM) frequently report mental health problems. It is unknown to what extent these migrants seek help for these problems in general practice and how these issues are explored, discussed, registered and treated by GPs. Objective. To gain insight in the registration and treatment of mental health problems in general practice of UM compared to documented migrants (DM). Methods. A survey study of general practice patient records of UM and DM in nine general practices in the Netherlands. Consultation rates, registration of mental health problems, prescription of psychotropic medication and referrals to mental health care institutions of UM and DM patients were compared. Results. A total of 541 migrants were included (325 UM and 216 DM). UM consulted a GP significantly less than DM (3.1 versus 4.9 times per year). Only 20.6% of the UM had at least one mental health problem diagnosis registered compared to 44.0% of the DM. In both groups, similar to 10% mentioned at least one main mental health complaint during the consultation that was not coded in the record. No significant differences were found in the prescription of psychotropic medication between the two groups. UM were referred less to mental health care institutions but more often to psychiatrists than to psychologists. Conclusion. UM had less consultations with their GP, and in these consultations, less mental health problems were registered. UM were referred less to psychologists but more often to psychiatrists. GPs are advised to explore and register mental health problems more actively in UM.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available