4.2 Article

Frequency of medication errors in primary care patients with polypharmacy

Journal

FAMILY PRACTICE
Volume 30, Issue 3, Pages 313-319

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cms070

Keywords

Chronic disease; medical comorbidity; medical errors; patient safety; pharmacology; drug reactions; primary care; quality of care

Funding

  1. European Union [223424]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Chronic diseases affect more than half of the population 75 years of age in developed countries. Prescription medication use increases with age. Depending on definition, 2580% of elderly are exposed to polypharmacy. Polypharmacy increases the risk of hospitalization, interactions and adverse drug reactions. To examine the frequency of medication errors in patients with polypharmacy treated in general practice. The medications of 169 patients with polypharmacy treated in 22 GP surgeries in Austria were analysed. The analysis identified (i) medication errors, including non-evidence-based medications, dosing errors and potentially dangerous interactions in all patients and (ii) potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) in the subgroup of elderly patients (65 years). The patients took on average 9.13.0 medications per day. The maximum, in one patient, was 20 medications per day. Some 93.5% had at least one non-evidence-based medication. On average, 2.71.66 medications per patient were found to be not indicated. At least one dosing error was found in 56.2% of all patients. One potential interaction of the most severe degree (category X interaction) was detected in 1.8% (n 3) and two such interactions in 0.6% (n 1). These combinations should have been avoided. Of the 169 patients, 158 were elderly (65 years). Of these seniors, 37.3% (n 59) had at least one PIM according to the PRISCUS list for the elderly. The frequency of medication errors is high in patients with polypharmacy in primary care. Development of strategies (e.g. external medication review) is required to counteract medication errors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available