4.2 Article

Interviews with primary care physicians regarding taking and interpreting the cancer family history

Journal

FAMILY PRACTICE
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages 334-340

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmn053

Keywords

Cancer genetics; family history; preventive medicine; primary care; risk assessment

Funding

  1. National Cancer Institute [R01 CA89521]
  2. Vermont Cancer Center Core [P30 CA22435]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. The cancer family history can be used to stratify risk and guide management regarding screening and prevention of cancer. Objective. The current study was designed to gain understanding of specific barriers to obtaining and using the cancer family history for the primary care physician. Methods. Interviews were conducted with structured samples of specialists in family medicine, general internal medicine and gynaecology in three settings in two north-eastern states. A medical anthropologist conducted interviews based on a topical outline; transcripts were systematically analyzed by a research team to identify major themes expressed by participants. Results. Among 40 urban, suburban and rural physicians interviewed, 40% were women and medical school graduation years ranged from 1963 to 2000. These physicians regarded cancer family history as important, but process and content were not standardized. Major barriers to more focused use of this information included limitations of patients' family history knowledge; time needed to clarify and interpret this information and the lack of clear and accessible guidelines to assist in collection, interpretation and management decisions for average, moderate and higher risk patients. Language and cultural barriers made it more difficult to collect family histories in some populations. Conclusions. Barriers to effective application of cancer family history information included limitations of patients' family history information; lack of methods to systematically and efficiently focus on the most useful information and lack of accessible guidance for risk stratification and management. Results suggest a need for support addressing these concerns to better utilize several readily available cancer risk management opportunities.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available