4.3 Article

A Case of Late Spontaneous Post-Radial Keratotomy Corneal Perforation Managed With Specialty Lenses

Journal

EYE & CONTACT LENS-SCIENCE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE
Volume 44, Issue -, Pages S341-S344

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/ICL.0000000000000353

Keywords

Radial keratotomy; Corneal perforation; Wound dehiscence; Bandage contact lenses; Scleral lenses

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: To describe a case of spontaneous wound dehiscence 29 years after radial keratotomy (RK) and to illustrate how specialty contact lenses were used for tectonic support and optic correction. Setting: Tertiary referral center for corneal pathology. Design: Case report. Results: In November 2014, a 62-year-old woman presented to the emergency department with a spontaneous corneal perforation in her left eye. Her ocular history was significant only for uncomplicated RK surgery performed in 1985 to correct myopia (-5.50 D) in both eyes. At the slit-lamp pronounced, bullous edema was seen in the inferotemporal quadrant of the left cornea with internal opening of the 3.30- and 5-o'clock positions incisions and severe localized thinning and aqueous leakage at the 5-o'clock position incision. There was no history of trauma. A conservative approach was adopted: application of a standard bandage lens was effective in tamponading the leakage, allowing the anterior chamber to reform; a custom-made soft lens was worn for tectonic support over a period of 4 months. Finally, visual acuity was restored to 20/20-by fitting a scleral lens. Conclusion: Spontaneous corneal perforation is a rare but more dramatic long-term complication after RK. The pivotal role of appropriately fitted soft bandage lenses in the conservative management of this type of complex perforation is highlighted. For optical correction, a scleral lens was fitted with excellent visual result, illustrating the added value of specialty contact lenses as an alternative to surgery in the management of postrefractive corneas.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available