4.3 Article

Determinants of the Frequency of Contact Lens Wear

Journal

EYE & CONTACT LENS-SCIENCE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE
Volume 39, Issue 3, Pages 200-204

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/ICL.0b013e31827a7ad3

Keywords

Contact lenses; Fitting; Survey; Frequency of lens wear; International

Categories

Funding

  1. Eurolens Research at the University of Manchester: Bausch + Lomb Inc.
  2. Ciba Vision (UK) Ltd.
  3. CooperVision Ltd.
  4. Johnson & Johnson Vision Care
  5. Menicon Co. Ltd.
  6. Sauflon Pharmaceuticals Ltd.
  7. Bulgaria - Johnson & Johnson Vision Care
  8. Israel - Johnson & Johnson Vision Care
  9. Romania - Johnson & Johnson Vision Care
  10. Slovenia - Johnson & Johnson Vision Care
  11. Hungary - Johnson & Johnson Vision Care
  12. Czech Republic - Johnson & Johnson Vision Care
  13. Australia - Optometrists Association Australia
  14. China - Ciba Vision Shanghai
  15. Korea - Korean Optometric Association
  16. Norway - Norwegian Association of Optometry
  17. the Netherlands - Bausch + Lomb Benelux
  18. Puerto Rico - Johnson & Johnson Vision Care
  19. Puerto Rico - Puerto Rico College of Optometrists
  20. Spain - Spanish General Council of the Colleges of Opticians Optometrists
  21. Sweden - Swedish Optometry Association
  22. Sweden - Swedish Contact Lens Association

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: To characterize and discover the determinants of the frequency of wear (FOW) of contact lenses. Methods: Survey forms were sent to contact lens fitters in up to 40 countries between January and March every year for 5 consecutive years (2007-2011). Practitioners were asked to record data relating to the first 10 contact lens fits or refits performed after receiving the survey form. Only data for daily wear lens fits were analyzed. Results: Data were collected in relation to 74,510 and 9,014 soft and rigid lens fits, respectively. Overall, FOW was 5.9 +/- 1.7 days per week (DPW). When considering the proportion of lenses worn between one to seven DPW, the distribution for rigid lenses is skewed toward full-time wear (7 DPW), whereas the distribution for soft daily disposable lenses is perhaps bimodal, with large and small peaks at seven and two DPW, respectively. There is a significant variation in FOW among nations (P<0.0001), ranging from 6.8 +/- 1.0 DPW in Greece to 5.1 +/- 2.5 DPW in Kuwait. For soft lenses, FOW increases with decreasing age. Females (6.0 +/- 1.6 DPW) wear lenses more frequently than males (5.8 +/- 1.7 DPW) (P=0.0002). FOW is greater among those wearing presbyopic corrections (6.1 +/- 1.4 DPW) compared with spherical (5.9 +/- 1.7 DPW) and toric (5.9 +/- 1.6 DPW) designs (P<0.0001). FOW with hydrogel peroxide systems (6.4 +/- 1.1 DPW) was greater than that with multipurpose systems (6.2 +/- 1.3 DPW) (P<0.0001). Conclusions: Numerous demographic and contact lens-related factors impact FOW. There may be a future trend toward a lower FOW associated with the increasing popularity of daily disposable lenses.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available