4.3 Article

Differences in the Daily Symptoms Associated With the Silicone Hydrogel Contact Lens Wear

Journal

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/ICL.0b013e3181c7bda6

Keywords

Silicone hydrogel contact lenses; Multipurpose solution; Symptoms; Times of the day; Adverse environments

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To determine the differences in symptoms associated with daily wear of silicone hydrogel (lotrafilcon B) contact lenses (CLs) after CL insertion and at the end of wear and their relationship with environmental factors and multipurpose solutions (Solo-care Aqua, CIBA Vision, Duluth, GA and Hidro Health, Disop, Spain). Methods: Fifty-four patients were fitted with lotrafilcon B CLs. Two multipurpose solutions were randomly assigned and prescribed in a double-masked crossover study with three visits. After each solution was used, two questionnaires were conducted, including a survey produced by us and Contact Lens Dry Eye Questionnaire. Our questionnaire included 10 items addressing discomfort, blurry vision, lens-handling problems, dryness, redness, tearing, burning, itching, discharge, and dissatisfaction. Patients were assigned scores from 0 (without Symptoms) to 10 (symptoms unbearable) at two different times (after CL insertion and at the end of wear) and in two environments (outdoors and adverse environments). Results: The average duration of CL wear was 8.32 +/- 2.27 hr/day and 5.85 +/- 1.30 days/week. All symptoms became worse (P < 0.05 Wilcoxon test, except lens handling) at the end of CL wear in all visits. The results were independent of the multipurpose solution used (P > 0.05 Friedman test), except for tearing, which showed statistical differences between visits (P = 0.03 Friedman test), Contact Lens Dry Eye Questionnaire showed increased dry eye symptoms at the end of wear (P < 0.05 Friedman test). Conclusions: Daily wear symptoms associated with lotrafilcon B CL increase with the time of wear. This increase in symptoms is nonrelated with the multipurpose solutions compared ill this Study.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available