4.6 Review

Action on AMD. Optimising patient management: act now to ensure current and continual delivery of best possible patient care

Journal

EYE
Volume 26, Issue -, Pages S2-S21

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/eye.2011.343

Keywords

age-related macular degeneration; anti-VEGF therapy; commissioning; health-care facilities; manpower; services

Categories

Funding

  1. Novartis Pharmaceuticals

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In recent years, there have been significant advances in the clinical management of patients with wet age-related macular degeneration (wet AMD)-a rapidly progressing and potentially blinding degenerative eye disease. Wet AMD is responsible for more than half of registered severe sight impairment (blindness) in the United Kingdom, and patients who are being treated for wet AMD require frequent and long-term follow-up for treatment to be most effective. The clinical workload associated with the frequent follow-up required is substantial. Furthermore, as more new patients are diagnosed and the population continues to age, the patient population will continue to increase. It is thus vital that clinical services continue to adapt so that they can provide a fast and efficient service for patients with wet AMD. This Action on AMD document has been developed by eye health-care professionals and patient representatives, the Action on AMD group. It is intended to highlight the urgent and continuing need for change within wet AMD services. This document also serves as a guide for eye health-care professionals, NHS commissioners, and providers to present possible solutions for improving NHS retinal and macular services. Examples of good practice and service development are considered and can be drawn upon to help services meet the recommended quality of care and achieve best possible outcomes. Eye (2012) 26, S2-S21; doi:10.1038/eye.2011.343

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available