4.6 Article

Prevalence and risk factors for primary open-angle glaucoma in a rural northeast China population: a population-based survey in Bin County, Harbin

Journal

EYE
Volume 26, Issue 2, Pages 283-291

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/eye.2011.243

Keywords

China; population-based study; prevalence; primary open-angle glaucoma; risk factors

Categories

Funding

  1. government of Bin County
  2. Second Hospital of HMU, China [2008-02, BS2010-16]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose To estimate the prevalence and associated risk factors of primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) in a rural population in northeast China. Methods A population-based survey was conducted within Bin County, Harbin of northeast China. Glaucoma was diagnosed using International Society of Geographical and Epidemiological Ophthalmology criteria. All the subjects underwent a complete ophthalmic examination. Results A total of 4956 (86.0%) of 5762 subjects aged 40 years or older were examined. The mean intraocular pressure (IOP) of right eyes was 14.0 (95% confidence interval (CI), 13.9 to 14.1) mmHg. The prevalence of POAG was 0.71% (35/4956, 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.93). In these POAG subjects, 17 (48.6%) had elevated IOP > 21 mmHg in either eye, 3 (8.8%) participants had been treated by laser trabeculoplasty or trabeculectomy and were known to have POAG. Vision impairment to varying degrees was present in 20 subjects (58.8%) with 1 subject blind in both eyes and 8 subjects blind in one eye. On multivariate analysis, age, family history of glaucoma, systemic hypertension, and IOP were regarded as significant independent risk factors. Conclusions POAG is a disease of serious consequence and of low diagnosis and treatment rates in rural northeast China. Age, family history of glaucoma, systemic hypertension, and IOP remain as significant independent risk factors for POAG. Eye (2012) 26, 283-291; doi:10.1038/eye.2011.243; published online 9 December 2011

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available