4.6 Article

The Cataract National Dataset electronic multicentre audit of 55 567 operations: antiplatelet and anticoagulant medications

Journal

EYE
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages 10-16

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.eye.6703069

Keywords

cataract surgery; Cataract National Dataset; complications; haemorrhage; antiplatelet; anticoagulant

Categories

Funding

  1. Cataract Do Once and Share Initiative
  2. EPR Users Group

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aims This study aims to establish the prevalence of aspirin, dipyridamole, clopidogrel, and warfarin use in patients undergoing cataract surgery, and to compare local anaesthetic and intraoperative complication rates between users and non-users. Methods The Cataract National Dataset was remotely extracted and anonymised on 55 567 operations at 12 NHS Trusts using electronic patient records (EPRs) between 2001 and 2006. Results This report analyses 48 862 of the 55 567 operations from the eight centres, which routinely recorded a drug history. In all, 28.1% of the 48 862 patients were taking aspirin, 5.1% warfarin, 1.9% clopidogrel, and 1.0% dipyridamole. The recording of any complication of a sharp needle or subtenon's cannula local anaesthetic block was increased in patients taking clopidogrel, 8.0% (P<0.0001) or warfarin, 6.2% (P = 0.0026) vs non-users, 4.3%, but no increase in potentially sight-threatening complications was identified. The incidence of subconjunctival haemorrhage was increased in patients taking clopidogrel, 4.4% (P<0.0001) or warfarin, 3.7% (P<0.0001) vs non-users, 1.7%. The recording of any operative complication was increased in those taking clopidogrel, 7.3% (P = 0.0002) vs non-users, 4.4%, but the haemorrhagic operative complications of choroidal/ suprachoroidal haemorrhage and hyphaema were not significantly increased. The non-haemorrhagic complication of posterior capsular rupture (PCR) was increased in those taking clopidogrel, 3.23% (P = 0.0057) vs non-users, 1.77%. Conclusions Clopidogrel or warfarin use was associated with a significant increase in minor complications of sharp needle and subtenon's cannula local anaesthesia but was not associated with a significant increase in potentially sight-threatening local anaesthetic or operative haemorrhagic complications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available