4.2 Article

Cloning and characterization of a novel fold-type I branched-chain amino acid aminotransferase from the hyperthermophilic archaeon Thermococcus sp CKU-1

Journal

EXTREMOPHILES
Volume 18, Issue 3, Pages 589-602

Publisher

SPRINGER JAPAN KK
DOI: 10.1007/s00792-014-0642-0

Keywords

Thermococcus; Aminotransferase; Branched-chain amino acid; Broad substrate specificity; Stopped-flow spectrophotometry

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sport, Science, and Technology, Japan (MEXT)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We successfully cloned a novel branched-chain amino acid aminotransferase (Ts-BcAT; EC 2.6.1.42) gene from the Thermococcus sp. CKU-1 genome and expressed it in the soluble fraction of Escherichia coli Rosetta (DE3) cells. Ts-BcAT is a homodimer with an apparent molecular mass of approximately 92 kDa. The primary structure of Ts-BcAT showed high homology with the fold-type I, subgroup I aminotransferases, but showed little homology with BcATs known to date, i.e., those of Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium, which belong to the fold-type IV, subgroup III aminotransferases. The maximum enzyme activity of Ts-BcAT was detected at 95 A degrees C, and Ts-BcAT did not lose any enzyme activity, even after incubation at 90 A degrees C for 5 h. Ts-BcAT was active in the pH range from 4.0 to 11.0, the optimum pH was 9.5, and the enzyme was stable between pH 6 and 7. The exceptionally low pK (a) of the nitrogen atom in the Lys258 epsilon-amino group in the internal aldimine bond of Ts-BcAT was determined to be 5.52 +/- A 0.05. Ts-BcAT used 21 natural and unnatural amino acids as a substrate in the overall transamination reaction. l-Leucine and other aliphatic amino acids are efficient substrates, while polar amino acids except glutamate were weak substrates. Phylogenetic analysis revealed that Ts-BcAT is a novel fold-type I, subgroup I branched-chain aminotransferase.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available