4.2 Article

Microbiology of diverse acidic and non-acidic microhabitats within a sulfidic ore mine

Journal

EXTREMOPHILES
Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages 911-922

Publisher

SPRINGER JAPAN KK
DOI: 10.1007/s00792-012-0488-2

Keywords

Acidophiles; Chemolithotrophy; Microbial consortia; Phylogeny; Gossan; Supergenic processes

Funding

  1. Institutional Research Concept [MSM0021620858]
  2. Czech Science Foundation [P506/11/1317]
  3. SVV [SVV-2012-265 206]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A wide variety of microhabitats within the extremely acidic abandoned underground copper mine Zlat, Hory (Czech Republic) was investigated. SSU rDNA libraries were analyzed from 15 samples representing gossan, sulfide-leaching environments in the oxidation zone, and acidic water springs in the mine galleries. Microbial analyses were extended by analyses of chemical composition of water and solid phases and identification of arising secondary minerals. The microbial communities of the three main classes of microenvironments differed in almost every aspect. Among others, ecological partitioning of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans and the recently described A. ferrivorans was observed. Distinct types of communities inhabiting the water springs were detected. The more extreme springs (pH < 3, conductivity > 2 mS/cm) were inhabited by Ferrovum spp. and A. ferrivorans, whereas Gallionella sp. dominated the less extreme ones. A new role for gossan in the extremely acidic ecosystem is proposed. This zone was inhabited by a large diversity of neutrophilic heterotrophs that appeared to be continuously washed out to the acidic environments localized downstream. Five species originating in gossan were found in several acidic habitats. Here they can survive and probably serve as scavengers of dead biomass, particularly from chemoautotrophic growths. No such process has been described from acidic mine environments so far.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available