4.4 Article

Utilization of poly(methyl methacrylate) - carbon nanotube and polystyrene - carbon nanotube in situ polymerized composites as masterbatches for melt mixing

Journal

EXPRESS POLYMER LETTERS
Volume 6, Issue 10, Pages 814-825

Publisher

BUDAPEST UNIV TECHNOL & ECON
DOI: 10.3144/expresspolymlett.2012.87

Keywords

polymer composites; nanocomposites; material testing; tailor-made polymers; carbon nanotubes

Funding

  1. Finnish Funding Agency for Technology and Innovation (Tekes) [2330/31/06]
  2. POPROK Graduate School

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Carbon nanotubes (CNTs) were melt mixed directly or by using an in situ polymerized masterbatch into a matrix polymer, polystyrene (PS) or poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA). The mechanical properties of the composites were mostly determined by the amount of CNTs, and not by the use of directly melt mixed CNTs or the use of the masterbatch. In contrast, the electrical resistivity of the composites was dependent on the manner in which the CNTs were added to the matrix polymer. When there was increased interfacial adhesion between the components, as for PS and the CNTs, the use of directly melt mixed CNTs gave better resistivity results. Without strong interactions between the CNTs and the matrix, as with PMMA and CNTs, the use of a tailored masterbatch had a significant effect on properties of the final composites. The molecular weight and viscosity of masterbatches can be varied and when the PMMA-masterbatch had optimized viscosity with respect to the PMMA matrix, electrical resistivity of the final composites decreased noticeably.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available