4.3 Article

A CASE STUDY OF CHIROPRACTIC MANAGEMENT OF PREGNANCY-RELATED HEARTBURN WITH POSTULATED FETAL EPIGENOME IMPLICATIONS

Journal

EXPLORE-THE JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND HEALING
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages 304-308

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.explore.2012.06.001

Keywords

Pregnancy; heartburn; chiropractic; neuroemotional technique; epigenome; manual medicine; treatment

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: This case study reports on chiropractic care for pregnancy-related heartburn. The purpose of this article is to relate the benefit of chiropractic treatment for one individual, to contrast chiropractic management with the biomedical standard of care for pregnancy-related heartburn, and to point to potential epigenetic implications of the standard of care. Clinical Features: A 32-year-old woman who was 24 weeks pregnant presented with persistent heartburn that she was treating with ranitidine (Zantac (R)) and calcium carbonate (Tums (R)) daily at the initiation of chiropractic care. Intervention and Outcome: Findings of the initial examination were thoracic intersegmental dysfunction and pain upon palpation of the diaphragm, with hypertonicity noted. Therapy localization was positive for reflexes associated with the esophagus and lower esophageal sphincter, suggesting spasms. Emotional components also were identified in association with the symptoms by the use of a mind body therapy called NeuroEmotional Technique. The patient was treated by adjusting the thoracic spine, manually releasing the diaphragm spasms, and releasing the esophageal spasm with an activator (a small hand-held instrument that creates a percussive force). The patient was symptom-free and did not use medication after the fifth treatment. She was followed throughout the remainder of her pregnancy and was asymptomatic and required no further treatment. Conclusions: A larger study should investigate the effectiveness of chiropractic care for the treatment of pregnancy-related heartburn.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available