4.7 Article

Hesitant triangular fuzzy information aggregation based on Einstein operations and their application to multiple attribute decision making

Journal

EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS
Volume 41, Issue 4, Pages 1086-1094

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2013.07.104

Keywords

Multiple attribute decision making (MADM); Hesitant triangular fuzzy elements; Operational laws; Hesitant triangular fuzzy Einstein weighted average (HTFEWA); operator; Hesitant triangular fuzzy Einstein weighted geometric (HTFEWG) operator

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61174149]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, we investigate the multiple attribute decision making (MADM) problems in which attribute values take the form of hesitant triangular fuzzy information. Firstly, definition and some operational laws of hesitant triangular fuzzy elements and score function of hesitant triangular fuzzy elements are introduced. Then, we have developed some hesitant triangular fuzzy aggregation operators based on the Einstein operation: the hesitant triangular fuzzy Einstein weighted averaging (HTFEWA) operator, hesitant triangular fuzzy Einstein weighted geometric (HTFEWG) operator, hesitant triangular fuzzy Einstein ordered weighted averaging (HTFEOWA) operator, hesitant triangular fuzzy Einstein ordered weighted geometric (HTFEOWG) operator, hesitant triangular fuzzy Einstein hybrid average (HTFEHA) operator and hesitant triangular fuzzy Einstein hybrid geometric (HTFEHG) operator. We have applied the hesitant triangular fuzzy Einstein weighted averaging (HTFEWA) operator, hesitant triangular fuzzy Einstein weighted geometric (HTFEWG) operators to multiple attribute decision making with hesitant triangular fuzzy information. Finally an illustrative example has been given to show the developed method. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available