4.6 Article

Focused-Ion-Beam-Milled Carbon Nanoelectrodes for Scanning Electrochemical Microscopy

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE ELECTROCHEMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 163, Issue 4, Pages H3032-H3037

Publisher

ELECTROCHEMICAL SOC INC
DOI: 10.1149/2.0071604jes

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [CHE-1213452, CHE-1300158]
  2. National Institutes of Health [R01 GM112656]
  3. Air Force Office of Scientific Research [MURI FA9550-14-1-0003]
  4. Division Of Chemistry
  5. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1300158] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nanoscale scanning electrochemical microscopy (SECM) has emerged as a powerful electrochemical method that enables the study of interfacial reactions with unprecedentedly high spatial and kinetic resolution. In this work, we develop carbon nanoprobes with high electrochemical reactivity and well-controlled size and geometry based on chemical vapor deposition of carbon in quartz nanopipets. Carbon-filled nanopipets are milled by focused ion beam (FIB) technology to yield flat disk tips with a thin quartz sheath as confirmed by transmission electron microscopy. The extremely high electroactivity of FIB-milled carbon nanotips is quantified by very high standard electron-transfer rate constants of >= 10 cm/s for Ru(NH3)(6)(3+). The tip size and geometry are characterized in electrolyte solutions by SECM approach curve measurements not only to determine inner and outer tip radii of down to similar to 27 and similar to 38 nm, respectively, but also to ensure the absence of a conductive carbon layer on the outer wall. In addition, FIB-milled carbon nanotips reveal the limited conductivity of similar to 100 nm-thick gold films under nanoscale mass-transport conditions. Importantly, carbon nanotips must be protected from electrostatic damage to enable reliable and quantitative nanoelectrochemical measurements. (C) 2015 The Electrochemical Society.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available