4.7 Article

Sentiment classification of online reviews to travel destinations by supervised machine learning approaches

Journal

EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS
Volume 36, Issue 3, Pages 6527-6535

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2008.07.035

Keywords

Sentiment classification; Online reviews; Travel destinations; Supervised machine learning algorithm

Funding

  1. Research Funding of Hong Kong Polytechnic University [G-YX93]
  2. Internet Research Center of China and NSFC [70771032, 70501009]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The rapid growth in Internet applications in tourism has lead to an enormous amount of personal reviews for travel-related information on the Web. These reviews can appear in different forms like BBS, blogs, Wiki or forum websites. More importantly, the information in these reviews is valuable to both travelers and practitioners for various understanding and planning processes. An intrinsic problem of the overwhelming information on the Internet, however, is information overloading as users are simply unable to read all the available information. Query functions in search engines like Yahoo and Google can help users find some of the reviews that they needed about specific destinations. The returned pages from these search engines are still beyond the visual capacity of humans. In this research, sentiment classification techniques were incorporated into the domain of mining reviews from travel blogs. Specifically, we compared three supervised machine learning algorithms of Naive Bayes, SVM and the character based N-gram model for sentiment classification of the reviews on travel blogs for seven popular travel destinations in the US and Europe. Empirical findings indicated that the SVM and N-gram approaches outperformed the Naive Bayes approach, and that when training datasets had a large number of reviews, all three approaches reached accuracies of at least 80%. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available