4.6 Article

Electrochemical Behavior of Electrolytic Manganese Dioxide in Aqueous KOH and LiOH Solutions: A Comparative Study

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE ELECTROCHEMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 163, Issue 3, Pages A356-A363

Publisher

ELECTROCHEMICAL SOC INC
DOI: 10.1149/2.1011602jes

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Laboratory Directed Research and Development program of Brookhaven National Laboratory (LDRD-BNL) [DE-AC02-98CH 10866]
  2. U.S. Department of Energy
  3. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DE-AC02-98CH10886]
  4. U.S. DOE Office of Science Facility, at Brookhaven National Laboratory [DE-SC0012704]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

As an inexpensive and high capacity oxidant, electrolytic manganese dioxide (gamma-MnO2) is of interest as a cathode for secondary aqueous batteries. Electrochemical behavior of gamma-MnO2 was characterized in aqueous 5.0 M KOH and LiOH solutions, and found to depend strongly upon cation identity. In LiOH and mixed LiOH / KOH solutions, Li-ion intercalation appeared to operate in competition with proton intercalation, being favored at higher [Li+] and, for mixed electrolytes, lower sweep rates. Electrochemical and in situ X-ray diffraction data indicated that gamma-MnO2 underwent a chemically irreversible transformation upon the first reduction in LiOH solution, while in KOH solution, structure was largely unchanged after the first cycle. These experiments with gamma-MnO2 as well as with a closely-related, ramsdellite-like sample, suggest that depending on sample morphology / rate capability, the irreversible process proceeds either through a solid-solution reaction or a two-phase reaction followed by a solid-solution reaction. While discharge capacity and capacity retention during galvanostatic cycling of gamma-MnO2 were worse in LiOH than in KOH solution, some improvement was noted in a mixed LiOH / KOH solution. (C) The Author(s) 2015 Published by ECS. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available