4.7 Article

A particle swarm optimization-aided fuzzy cloud classifier applied for plant numerical taxonomy based on attribute similarity

Journal

EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS
Volume 36, Issue 5, Pages 9388-9397

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2008.12.065

Keywords

PSOCCAS; Plant numerical taxonomy; Weight; Flora Key; Expected species

Funding

  1. Master's Academe of Zhejiang Normal University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Data mining techniques are widely used in many fields. One application of data mining in the field of the botany is numerical taxonomy. In the present work, a particle swarm optimization-aided fuzzy cloud classifier based on attribute similarity (PSOCCAS) is used for plant taxonomy by two datasets. Firstly, the proposed classifier is been tested by employing it for the benchmark classification data sets, Fisher's iris data. The testing accuracy is found very encouraging. The performance of our proposed system is only bettered by some generic algorithm (GA) or evolutionary algorithm (EA)-based fuzzy systems which showed fantastic results. Then for further validation and broadening application, the PSOCCAS has been presented for quantitative features evaluation, 'expected species' selection and successful classification of three sections in genus Camellia (belongs to the family Theaceae). The selected quantitative features are almost those selected ill previous works. The method is able to produce 100% accurate classification results in genus Camellia. It is a very simple and robust method to divergences in plant taxonomy. No extensive preprocessing is required. The classification is performed with comparatively comprehensive features than those used in our previous work. The method utilizes the inherent nature of the data in performing Various tasks. Consequently, the method call be used for plant numerical taxonomy. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available