4.2 Review

Neisseria proteomics for antigen discovery and vaccine development

Journal

EXPERT REVIEW OF PROTEOMICS
Volume 11, Issue 5, Pages 573-591

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1586/14789450.2014.938640

Keywords

biological and environmental stress; immuno-proteome; Neisseria gonorrhoeae; Neisseria lactamica; Neisseria meningitidis; outer membrane; proteome; vaccine antigen; vesicle

Funding

  1. GlaxoSmithKline
  2. Medical Research Council, UK [MR/K027131/1]
  3. Wellcome Trust, UK [090301/Z/09/Z]
  4. University of Southampton
  5. Wellcome Trust [090301/Z/09/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust
  6. MRC [MR/K027131/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  7. Medical Research Council [MR/K027131/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Neisseria meningitidis (meningococcus) is a major causative organism of meningitis and sepsis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae (gonococcus) is the causative organism of the sexually transmitted disease gonorrhea. Infections caused by meningococci are vaccine-preventable, whereas gonococcal vaccine research and development has languished for decades and the correlates of protection are still largely unknown. In the past two decades, complementary omic' platforms have been developed to interrogate Neisseria genomes and gene products. Proteomic techniques applied to whole Neisseria bacteria, outer membranes and outer membrane vesicle vaccines have generated protein maps and also allowed the examination of environmental stresses on protein expression. In particular, immuno-proteomics has identified proteins whose expression is correlated with the development of human natural immunity to meningococcal infection and colonization and following vaccination. Neisseria proteomic techniques have produced a catalog of potential vaccine antigens and investigating the functional and biological properties of these proteins could finally provide universal' Neisseria vaccines.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available