4.2 Review

Proteomic identification of protease cleavage sites: cell-biological and biomedical applications

Journal

EXPERT REVIEW OF PROTEOMICS
Volume 10, Issue 5, Pages 421-433

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1586/14789450.2013.841547

Keywords

caspases; cathepsins; degradomics; granzymes; limited proteolysis; matrix metalloproteinases; pharmacological protease inhibition; peptidomics; protease specificity

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [SCHI 871/2]
  2. European Research Council [ERC-2011-StG 282111-ProteaSys]
  3. Excellence Initiative of the German Federal Government (BIOSS) [EXC 294]
  4. Excellence Initiative of the German State Government (BIOSS) [EXC 294]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Proteolysis shapes proteomes by protein degradation or restricted proteolysis, which generates stable cleavage products. Proteolytic (in-)activation of enzymes and cytokines is an essential aspect of the functional proteome status. Proteome-wide identification and quantification of proteolytic processing is accessible by complementary techniques for the focused analysis of protein termini. These innovative strategies are now widely applied and have transformed protease research. Pioneering studies portrayed apoptotic and caspase-dependent cleavage events. Protease-centric investigations focused predominantly on matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), granzymes and aspartyl and cysteine cathepsins. The first in vivo degradomic studies were performed with mice lacking either cysteine cathepsins or matrix metalloproteinases. Process-centric degradomic analyses investigated infectious processes and mitochondrial import. Peptidomic analyses yielded disease biomarkers representing cleavage fragments from bodily fluids. The diversity of degradomic endeavors illustrates the importance of portraying proteolytic processing in health and disease. The present review provides an overview of the current status of degradomic studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available