4.6 Article

Exploring Impedance Growth in High Voltage NMC/Graphite Li-Ion Cells Using a Transmission Line Model

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE ELECTROCHEMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 163, Issue 3, Pages A522-A529

Publisher

ELECTROCHEMICAL SOC INC
DOI: 10.1149/2.0901603jes

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NSERC
  2. 3M Canada under Industrial Research Chairs program
  3. Faye Sobey Student Undergraduate Research Endowment
  4. NSERC through the CREATE DREAMS program at Dalhousie University
  5. NSERC through the PGS-D program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A discrete transmission line model (TLM) for the impedance of the positive electrode in a Li-ion cell was studied to investigate causes of impedance increase for Li[Ni0.42Mn0.42Co0.16]O-2 (NMC442) positive electrodes operated at high voltage (>4.4 V vs. Li/Li+). The TLM included contact resistance between the conductive carbon and the active particles (R-c), electrical path resistance through the carbon network (R-e), ionic path resistance through the bulk electrolyte (R-i) and transfer resistance/capacitance (R-s, (C)) through the SEI layers formed on the active particles. It was found that an increase in any of R-e, R-i or R-c was necessary to increase the high frequency intercept of the impedance spectra. A limited increase in the spectrum diameter of the TLM was achievable by increasing R-e or R-i, but an unlimited increase was only possible by increasing the SEI resistance R-s. Comparison with experiment concluded that the high voltage impedance growth observed in NMC442/graphite cells is primarily due to increases in R-s, while minor increases in R-e, R-i or R-c may occur. A brief investigation of inhomogeneous SEI capacitance/resistance produced impedance spectra with a range of heights and asymmetries. This can explain in part the variety of shapes of impedance spectra from real impedance measurements of Li-ion cells. (C) The Author(s) 2015 Published by ECS. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available