4.6 Article

Micro-Four-Line Probe to Measure Electronic Conductivity and Contact Resistance of Thin-Film Battery Electrodes

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE ELECTROCHEMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 162, Issue 10, Pages A2145-A2151

Publisher

ELECTROCHEMICAL SOC INC
DOI: 10.1149/2.0581510jes

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Advanced Battery Materials Research (BMR) program of the U.S. Department of Energy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Electronic conductivity of battery electrodes and the interfacial resistance at the current collector are key metrics affecting cell performance. However, in many cases they have not been properly quantified because of the lack of a suitably accurate and convenient non-destructive measurement method. There are also indications that conductivity across deposited films is not uniformly distributed. To characterize these variations, a micro-four-line probe has been developed for local rnesoscale measurement of electronic conductivity of thin-film electrodes. The micro-four-line probe, coupled with a previously discussed mathematical model, overcomes key limitations of traditional point probes. This new approach allows pressure-controlled surface measurements to determine electronic conductivity without removal of the current collector. In addition, the probe allows one to measure the local interfacial contact resistance between the electrode film and the current collector. The method was validated by comparing to other conductivity sampling methods for a conductive test film. Three commercial-quality Li-ion battery porous electrodes were also tested and conductivity maps were produced. The results show significant local conductivity variation in such electrodes on a millimeter length. scale. This method is of value to battery manufacturers and researchers to better quantify sources of resistance and heterogeneity and to improve electrode quality. (C) The Author(s) 2015. Published by ECS. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available