4.6 Article

Carbon Deposition and Sulfur Poisoning in SrFe0.75Mo0.25O3-δ and SrFe0.5Mn0.25Mo0.25O3-δ Electrode Materials for Symmetrical SOFCs

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE ELECTROCHEMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 162, Issue 9, Pages F1078-F1087

Publisher

ELECTROCHEMICAL SOC INC
DOI: 10.1149/2.0981509jes

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Centre Poland (NCN) [DEC-2011/03/N/ST5/04785]
  2. NCN under the ETIUDA doctoral scholarship [DEC-2013/08/T/ST5/00100]
  3. Research Council of Norway [219731]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Redox stable SrFe0.75Mo0.25O3-delta and SrFe0.5Mn0.25Mo0.25O3-delta electrode materials were studied in terms of their physicochemical properties and electrochemical performance in symmetrical SOFCs, with focus on their tolerance toward carbon deposition and sulfur poisoning. Both materials possess cubic, B-site cation-disordered Pm-3m structure in air up to high temperatures. SrFe0.5Mn0.25Mo0.25O3-delta was found to transform to a B-site cation-ordered structure after reduction in dry 5 vol% H-2/Ar at 1100 degrees C, while no structural changes were observed for SrFe0.75Mo0.25O3-delta. Weight change upon annealing up to 850 degrees C in air and in dry 5 vol% H-2/Ar indicated an increase in oxygen deficiency on the order of delta = 0.2. Seebeck coefficient and conductivity dependence on the oxygen partial pressure pO(2) showed that both oxides exhibit p-type conductivity in air and n-type conductivity under reducing conditions. Carbon deposition was found to depend on temperature, gas composition (CO or CH4), and presence of Ce0.8Gd0.2O1.9 electrolyte in the composite-type electrode. Stable fuel cell performance, without carbon deposition, was obtained for SrFe0.75Mo0.25O3-delta-based SOFC in 10 vol% of CO in CO2. Also, SOFC operation with CH4 as fuel was achieved without coking at temperatures <= 700 degrees C. However, both oxides suffer from sulfur poisoning-related effects in atmosphere with 800 ppm H2S. (C) The Author(s) 2015. Published by ECS. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available