4.5 Review

14-3-3ζ as a prognostic marker and therapeutic target for cancer

Journal

EXPERT OPINION ON THERAPEUTIC TARGETS
Volume 14, Issue 12, Pages 1343-1354

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1517/14728222.2010.531011

Keywords

14-3-3 zeta; apoptosis; cancer; chemoresistance; prognostic marker

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [ROI-CA112567, PO1-CA099031]
  2. DOD Synergistic Award [W81XWH-08-1-0712]
  3. Susan C. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation [KG091020]
  4. Cancer Prevention Research Institute of Texas [RP100726]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Importance of the field: The ubiquitously expressed 14-3-3 zeta protein is involved in numerous important cellular pathways involved in cancer. Recent research suggests 14-3-3 zeta may play a central role regulating multiple pathways responsible for cancer initiation and progression. This review will provide an overview of 14-3-3 proteins and address the role of 14-3-3 zeta overexpression in cancer. Areas covered in this review: The review covers the basic role of 14-3-3 in regulation of multiple pathways with a focus on 14-3-3 zeta as a clinically relevant biomarker for cancer recurrence. What the reader will gain: 14-3-3 zeta overexpression has been found in multiple cancers; however, the clinical implications were unclear. Recently, 14-3-3 zeta has been identified as a biomarker for poor prognosis and chemoresistance in multiple tumor types, indicating a potential clinical application for using 14-3-3 zeta in selecting treatment options and predicting cancer patients' outcome. Take home message: 14-3-3 zeta is a potential prognostic marker of cancer recurrence and predictive marker for therapeutic resistance. The overexpression of 14-3-3 zeta in multiple cancers suggests that it may be a common target to intervene tumor progression; therefore, more efforts are needed for the development of 14-3-3 inhibitors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available