4.5 Review

Carbonic anhydrase inhibitors as antitumor/antimetastatic agents: a patent review (2008-2018)

Journal

EXPERT OPINION ON THERAPEUTIC PATENTS
Volume 28, Issue 10, Pages 729-740

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/13543776.2018.1508453

Keywords

Carbonic anhydrase; hypoxia; HIF; small molecule inhibitor; antibody; conjugate; sulfonamide; anti-tumor

Funding

  1. Ente Cassa di Risparmio di Firenze, Italy [ECR 2016.0774]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: Human carbonic anhydrases (CA, EC 4.2.1.1) IX and XII are tumor-associated proteins, being part of the molecular machinery that tumor cells build as adaptive responses to hypoxia and acidic conditions characteristic of the 'glycolytic shift' of many tumors. A wealth of research depicts CA IX and CA XII as biomarkers and therapeutic targets for various cancer types. Areas covered: The review presents an overview of the role of CA IX and CA XII in hypoxic tumors physio-pathology as well as the principal molecular, structural, and catalytic features of both isozymes. The review then covers the patent literature of medically relevant inhibitors of the tumor-associated CAs produced during the period 2008-2018. Expert opinion: A variety of approaches and design strategies were reported which afford CA IX/XII-specific inhibitors and avoid the compromising effects of isoforms-promiscuous compounds. Access to the crystal structures of human CAs isoforms have improved structure-based drug design campaigns related to zinc-binder chemotypes. Nevertheless, great potential still resides in non-classical CAIs that exhibit alternative binding mechanisms able to further distinguish the various active sites architecture. CA IX inhibitors hybrids/conjugates are increasingly emerging in the field as promising therapeutic tools to combine CA inhibition to the anticancer effects of other moieties or antitumor drugs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available