4.5 Review

Anticonvulsant/antiepileptic carbonic anhydrase inhibitors: a patent review

Journal

EXPERT OPINION ON THERAPEUTIC PATENTS
Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages 717-724

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1517/13543776.2013.782394

Keywords

anticonvulsant; antiepileptic; carbonic anhydrase; carbonic anhydrase inhibitor; drug design; seizures

Funding

  1. NIH [GM25154]
  2. HHMI Science for Life award

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: An epileptic seizure is a transient occurrence of signs and/or symptoms due to abnormal excessive or synchronous neuronal activity in the brain. The International League Against Epilepsy classifies seizures in two broad categories: partial (localized to one cerebral hemisphere) and generalized (localized to both cerebral hemispheres). One indirect pathway for the treatment of epilepsy includes the inhibition of carbonic anhydrase (CA), thereby increasing CO2 levels in the brain. Areas covered: Carbonic anhydrases (EC 4.2.1.1) are ubiquitous metalloenzymes that catalyze the reversible hydration/dehydration of CO2/HCO3-, respectively. CA inhibitors (CAIs) such as acetazolamide, methazolamide, topiramate, zonisamide, and sulthiame can reduce seizures through perturbation of the CO2 equilibrium and/or the inhibition of ion channels. This review focuses on the mechanism of epilepsy, CA catalysis, and recent developments in the treatment of epilepsy using CAIs. Expert opinion: Based on the observed active-site binding interactions of CAIs in crystal structures and their respective inhibition constants, structure-activity relationships can be mapped. Various CAIs along with novel techniques to administer them have been patented in the last four years. However, epilepsy continues to be a path less traveled when it comes to CAIs. A major area of research must focus toward the design of isoform-specific inhibitors using analogs of existing CAIs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available