4.5 Review

GLYX-13, an NMDA receptor glycine site functional partial agonist enhances cognition and produces antidepressant effects without the psychotomimetic side effects of NMDA receptor antagonists

Journal

EXPERT OPINION ON INVESTIGATIONAL DRUGS
Volume 23, Issue 2, Pages 243-254

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1517/13543784.2014.852536

Keywords

antidepressant; depression; glycine site; major depressive disorder; NMDA receptor; rapid-acting

Funding

  1. Naurex, Inc.
  2. Naurex
  3. AgeneBio
  4. Nektar
  5. CoLucid
  6. Ralph and Marian Falk Medical Research Trust (Chicago, IL)
  7. NIH [MH094835]
  8. PK Stanton [NS044421]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: The N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor-ionophore complex plays a key role in learning and memory and has efficacy in animals and humans with affective disorders. GLYX-13 is an N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) glycine-site functional partial agonist and cognitive enhancer that also shows rapid antidepressant activity without psychotomimetic side effects. Areas covered: The authors review the mechanism of action of GLYX-13 that was investigated in preclinical studies and evaluated in clinical studies. Specifically, the authors review its pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, and drug safety that were demonstrated in clinical studies. Expert opinion: NMDAR full antagonists can produce rapid antidepressant effects in treatment-resistant subjects; however, they are often accompanied by psychotomimetic effects that make chronic use outside of a clinical trial inpatient setting problematic. GLYX-13 appears to exert its antidepressant effects in the frontal cortex via NMDAR-triggered synaptic plasticity. Understanding the mechanistic underpinning of GLYX-13's antidepressant action should provide both novel insights into the role of the glutamatergic system in depression and identify new targets for therapeutic development.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available