4.5 Review

Applying machine learning techniques for ADME-Tox prediction: a review

Journal

EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG METABOLISM & TOXICOLOGY
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages 259-271

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1517/17425255.2015.980814

Keywords

absorption; distribution; metabolism; excretion and toxicity of xenobiotics; in silico drug design; machine learning; molecular modeling; pharmacokinetics; quantitative structure-activity relationships

Funding

  1. FAPESP (Brazilian Research Founding Agency)
  2. CNPq (Brazilian Research Founding Agency)
  3. CAPES (Brazilian Research Founding Agency)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: Pharmacokinetics involves the study of absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion and toxicity of xenobiotics (ADME-Tox). In this sense, the ADME-Tox profile of a bioactive compound can impact its efficacy and safety. Moreover, efficacy and safety were considered some of the major causes of clinical failures in the development of new chemical entities. In this context, machine learning (ML) techniques have been often used in ADME-Tox studies due to the existence of compounds with known pharmacokinetic properties available for generating predictive models. Areas covered: This review examines the growth in the use of some ML techniques in ADME-Tox studies, in particular supervised and unsupervised techniques. Also, some critical points (e. g., size of the data set and type of output variable) must be considered during the generation of models that relate ADME-Tox properties and biological activity. Expert opinion: ML techniques have been successfully employed in pharmacokinetic studies, helping the complex process of designing new drug candidates from the use of reliable ML models. An application of this procedure would be the prediction of ADME-Tox properties from studies of quantitative structure-activity relationships or the discovery of new compounds from a virtual screening using filters based on results obtained from ML techniques.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available