4.5 Review

Systems biology and functional genomics approaches for the identification of cellular responses to drug toxicity

Journal

EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG METABOLISM & TOXICOLOGY
Volume 4, Issue 11, Pages 1379-1389

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1517/17425255.4.11.1379

Keywords

high-throughput toxicity screening; susceptibility; systems biology; toxicogenomics; toxicogenetics

Funding

  1. NIAAA NIH HHS [R01 AA016258, R01 AA016258-04] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIEHS NIH HHS [P42 ES005948-140010, U19 ES011391, P42 ES005948, R01 ES015241, R01 ES015241-01A1, U19 ES011391-05] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Extensive growth in the field of molecular biology in recent decades has led to the development of new and powerful experimental and computational tools that enable the analysis of complex biological responses to chemical exposure on both a functional and structural genetic level. The ability to profile global responses on a transcriptional level has become a valuable resource in the science of toxicology and attempts are now being made to further understand toxicity mechanisms by incorporating metabolomics and proteomics approaches. in addition, recent progress in understanding the extent of the genetic diversity within and between species allows us to take a fresh look at research on genetic polymorphisms that may influence an individual's susceptibility to toxicity. Whereas new technologies have the potential to make a sizeable impact on our understanding of the mechanisms of toxicity, considerable challenges remain to be addressed, especially with regard to the regulatory acceptance and successful integration of omics data. This review highlights recent advancements in the application of functional and structural genomics techniques to chemical hazard identification and characterization, and to the understanding of the interindividual differences in susceptibility to adverse drug reactions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available