4.6 Review

Poly(amidoamine) dendrimer complexes as a platform for gene delivery

Journal

EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG DELIVERY
Volume 10, Issue 12, Pages 1687-1698

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1517/17425247.2013.853661

Keywords

cytotoxicity; dendrimer; gene delivery; gene therapy; siRNA carrier

Funding

  1. Belarussian Republican Foundation for Fundamental Research [B13MS-004]
  2. National Research Centre of Poland [DEC-2012/04/M/NZ1/00059]
  3. European Union [PIRSES-GA-2012-316730 NANOGENE]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: Gene therapy is one of the most effective ways to treat major infectious diseases, cancer and genetic disorders. It is based on several viral and non-viral systems for nucleic acid delivery. The number of clinical trials based on application of non-viral drug and gene delivery systems is rapidly increasing. Areas covered: This review discusses and summarizes recent advances in poly (amidoamine) dendrimers as effective gene carriers in vitro and in vivo, and their advantages and disadvantages relative to viral vectors and other non-viral systems (liposomes, linear polymers) are considered. Expert opinion: In this regard, dendrimers are non-immunogenic and have the highest efficiency of transfection among other non-viral systems, and none of the drawbacks characteristic for viral systems. The toxicity of dendrimers both in vitro and in vivo is an important question that has been addressed on many occasions. Several non-toxic and efficient multifunctional dendrimer-based conjugates for gene delivery, along with modifications to improve transfection efficiency while decreasing cytotoxicity, are discussed. Twelve paradigms that affected the development of dendrimer-based gene delivery are described. The conclusion is that dendrimers are promising candidates for gene delivery, but this is just the beginning and further studies are required before using them in human gene therapy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available