4.6 Review

Dual delivery of an antibiotic and a growth factor addresses both the microbiological and biological challenges of contaminated bone fractures

Journal

EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG DELIVERY
Volume 8, Issue 12, Pages 1555-1569

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1517/17425247.2011.628655

Keywords

antibiotic; bone; bone morphogenetic protein; dual purpose; graft; growth factor; infection; scaffold; tissue engineering

Funding

  1. Orthopedic Extremity Trauma Research Program (DoD) [W81XWH-07-1-0211]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: Open fractures are plagued by high complication rates, among which infection and nonunion are the most common, leading to higher morbidity and poor patient outcomes. Despite meticulous surgical care and employment of adjunctive therapies, infection rates remain at 20%, due to the limitations of conventional therapies. Areas covered: Persistent bacteria often survive initial debridement and treatment with antibiotics. Thus, the bone graft subsequently implanted to promote healing can be the nidus for infection. The principles of biofilm theory and the race to the surface have been applied to develop dual-purpose bone grafts that are protected by a sustained release of an antibiotic, thereby preventing bacterial colonization. A simultaneous sustained release of a recombinant human growth factor allows the defect to become vascularized and heal. Expert opinion: Current therapies fail to meet the challenges of open fractures. Tissue engineering and drug delivery approaches can address the challenges of healing large bone defects while protecting the implant from infection. When combined as an adjunctive therapy with existing clinical practices for management of open fractures, dual-purpose bone grafts that release both an antibiotic and a growth factor at biologically relevant time scales can potentially reduce infection rates and improve patient outcomes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available