4.3 Article

Combination of entecavir with thymosin alpha-1 in HBV-related compensated cirrhosis: a prospective multicenter randomized open-label study

Journal

EXPERT OPINION ON BIOLOGICAL THERAPY
Volume 18, Issue -, Pages 61-69

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/14712598.2018.1451511

Keywords

Hepatitis B virus; liver cirrhosis; hepatocellular carcinoma; immune regulator; thymosin alpha-1; Ta-1

Funding

  1. National Science and Technology Major Project [2013ZX10002004]
  2. Project of Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Commission [D121100003912003, Z151100004015237]
  3. National Key Technologies RD Program [2015BAI13B09]
  4. SciClone Pharmaceuticals

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Thymosin alpha-1 (Ta-1) suppresses HBV viral replication, while the evidence of combination effect with nucleoide is still limited. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of combination therapy of Ta-1 with entecavir (ETV) in patients with compensated liver cirrhosis.Research design and methods: A total of 690 patients were randomized to receive Ta-1 plus ETV (n=351) or ETV monotherapy (n=339) for 52weeks after 26weeks of ETV treatment, followed by continued entecavir therapy. The primary endpoint was defined as liver decompensation, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) or death.Results: The median followed up was 38.2months. The cumulative incidence of liver decompensation, HCC, or death were similar between two groups. During the Ta-1 combination treatment, the HCC incidence was 1.7% in combination group and 2.1% in ETV group, without new HCC cases developed during week 39 to week 77 in combination group. The virologic response, serologic response, biochemical response was similar between two groups at week 104. Both therapies were well-tolerated.Conclusion: There was no significant difference between two groups in endpoint events, while combination therapy with Ta-1 has a tendency to inhibit the development of HCC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available