4.3 Review

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-engineered lymphocytes for cancer therapy

Journal

EXPERT OPINION ON BIOLOGICAL THERAPY
Volume 11, Issue 7, Pages 855-873

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1517/14712598.2011.573476

Keywords

adoptive T cell therapy; cellular therapy; chimeric antigen receptor; gene therapy; T-body

Funding

  1. Department of Defense [R01 CA142636 NIH-NCI, P50 CA126752 NIH-NCI, PR093892]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: Chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) usually combine the antigen binding site of a monoclonal antibody with the signal activating machinery of a T cell, freeing antigen recognition from MHC restriction and thus breaking one of the barriers to more widespread application of cellular therapy. Similar to treatment strategies employing monoclonal antibodies, T cells expressing CARs are highly targeted, but additionally offer the potential benefits of active trafficking to tumor sites, in vivo expansion and long-term persistence. Furthermore, gene transfer allows the introduction of countermeasures to tumor immune evasion and of safety mechanisms. Areas covered: The basic structure of so-called first and later generation CARs and their potential advantages over other immune therapy systems. How these molecules can be grafted into immune cells (including retroviral and non-retroviral transduction methods) and strategies to improve the in vivo persistence and function of immune cells expressing CARs. Examples of tumor-associated antigens that have been targeted in preclinical models and clinical experience with these modified cells. Safety issues surrounding CAR gene transfer into T cells and potential solutions to them. Expert opinion: Because of recent advances in immunology, genetics and cell processing, CAR-modified T cells will likely play an increasing role in the cellular therapy of cancer, chronic infections and autoimmune disorders.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available