4.4 Article

A spectral chart method for estimating the mean turbulent kinetic energy dissipation rate

Journal

EXPERIMENTS IN FLUIDS
Volume 53, Issue 4, Pages 1005-1013

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00348-012-1337-x

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present an empirical but simple and practical spectral chart method for determining the mean turbulent kinetic energy dissipation rate in a variety of turbulent flows. The method relies on the validity of the first similarity hypothesis of Kolmogorov (C R (Doklady) Acad Sci R R SS, NS 30:301-305, 1941) (or K41) which implies that spectra of velocity fluctuations scale on the kinematic viscosity nu and at large Reynolds numbers. However, the evidence, based on the DNS spectra, points to this scaling being also valid at small Reynolds numbers, provided effects due to inhomogeneities in the flow are negligible. The methods avoid the difficulty associated with estimating time or spatial derivatives of the velocity fluctuations. It also avoids using the second hypothesis of K41, which implies the existence of a -5/3 inertial subrange only when the Taylor microscale Reynods number R (lambda) is sufficiently large. The method is in fact applied to the lower wavenumber end of the dissipative range thus avoiding most of the problems due to inadequate spatial resolution of the velocity sensors and noise associated with the higher wavenumber end of this range.The use of spectral data (30 a parts per thousand currency sign R (lambda) a parts per thousand currency sign 400) in both passive and active grid turbulence, a turbulent mixing layer and the turbulent wake of a circular cylinder indicates that the method is robust and should lead to reliable estimates of in flows or flow regions where the first similarity hypothesis should hold; this would exclude, for example, the region near a wall.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available