4.6 Article

Vertical coalescence during nucleate boiling from a single artificial cavity

Journal

EXPERIMENTAL THERMAL AND FLUID SCIENCE
Volume 51, Issue -, Pages 94-102

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2013.07.005

Keywords

Nucleate pool boiling; Single bubble growth; Vertical coalescence; Artificial cavity

Funding

  1. UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) [EP/C532813/1]
  2. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/K00963X/1, EP/C532813/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. EPSRC [EP/K00963X/1, EP/C532813/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this experimental study bubble growth from an isolated artificial cavity micro-fabricated on a 380 gm thick silicon wafer was investigated. The horizontally oriented boiling surface was heated by a thin resistance heater integrated on the rear of the silicon test section. The temperature was measured using an integrated micro-sensor situated on the boiling surface with the artificial cavity located in its geometrical centre. To conduct saturated pool boiling experiments the test section was immersed in degassed fluorinert FC-72. Bubble nucleation, growth, detachment and the evaporative heat flux at different pressures were analysed using high-speed imaging and temperature micro-sensors. Vertical coalescence was initially observed at the boundary between the isolated bubble and interference regimes. For wall superheats outside the isolated bubble regime, the occurrence of vertical coalescence is decreasing with increasing pressure. Although vertical coalescence seems initially more frequent with increasing wall superheat, the explicit dependency on temperature is covered by the scattering nature of the data. The applied heat flux was compared to the evaporative heat flux, nominally based on an arbitrary chosen area of influence on the boiling substrate. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available