4.6 Article

Experimental investigation of turbulence modulation in particle-laden coaxial jets by Phase Doppler Anemometry

Journal

EXPERIMENTAL THERMAL AND FLUID SCIENCE
Volume 33, Issue 3, Pages 517-526

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2008.11.004

Keywords

Phase Doppler Anemometry; Two-phase coaxial jet; Flow field measurement; Turbulence modulation

Funding

  1. Complexe de Recherche Interprofessionnel Aerothermochimie at University of Rouen France
  2. UTIQUE 2007 Program (EGIDE)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The effect of solid particles on the flow characteristics of axisymmetric turbulent coaxial jets for two flow conditions was studied. Simultaneous measurements of size and velocity distributions of continuous and dispersed phases in a two-phase flow are presented using a Phase Doppler Anemometry (PDA) technique. Spherical glass particles with a particle diameter range from 102 to 212 mu m were used in this two-phase flow, the experimental results indicate a significant influence of the solid particles and the Re on the flow characteristics. The data show that the gas phase has lower mean velocity in the near-injector region and a higher mean velocity at the developed region. Near the injector at low Reynolds number (Re = 2839) the presence of the particles dampens the gas-phase turbulence, while at higher Reynolds number (Re = 11893) the gas-phase turbulence and the velocity fluctuation of particle-laden jets are increased. The particle velocity at higher Reynolds number (Re = 11893) and is lower at lower Reynolds number (Re = 2839). The slip velocity between particles and gas phase existed over the flow domain was examined. More importantly, the present experiment results suggest that, consideration of the gas characteristic length scales is insufficient to predict gas-phase turbulence modulation in gas-particle flows. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available