4.3 Article

Brachial artery vasodilatation during prolonged lower limb exercise: role of shear rate

Journal

EXPERIMENTAL PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 96, Issue 10, Pages 1019-1027

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1113/expphysiol.2011.059584

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. AHA [11POST5080002]
  2. NIH [T32-AR048523, P01-HL-095486, P01-HL-052490, HL-36088, R01-HL-093167]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We recently observed a marked increase in brachial artery (BA) diameter during prolonged leg cycling exercise. The purpose of the present study was to test the hypothesis that this increase in BA diameter during lower limb exercise is shear stress mediated. Accordingly, we determined whether recapitulation of cycling-induced BA shear rate with forearm heating, a known stimulus evoking shear-induced conduit artery dilatation, would elicit comparable profiles and magnitudes of BA vasodilatation to those observed during cycling. In 12 healthy men, BA diameter and blood velocity were measured simultaneously using Doppler ultrasonography at baseline and every 5 min during 60 min of either steady-state semi-recumbent leg cycling (120W) or forearm heating. At the onset of cycling, the BA diameter was reduced (-3.9 +/- 1.2% at 5 min; P<0.05), but it subsequently increased throughout the remainder of the exercise bout (+15.1 +/- 1.6% at 60 min; P<0.05). The increase in BA diameter during exercise was accompanied by an approximately 2.5-fold rise in BA mean shear rate (P<0.05). Similar increases in BA mean shear with forearm heating elicited an equivalent magnitude of BA vasodilatation to that observed during cycling (P>0.05). Herein, we found that in the absence of exercise the extent of the BA vasodilator response was reproduced when the BA was exposed to comparable magnitudes of shear rate via forearm heating. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that shear stress plays a key role in signalling brachial artery vasodilatation during dynamic leg exercise.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available