4.2 Article

Antigenic components, isolation and partial characterization of excretion-secretion fraction of Paramphistomum cervi

Journal

EXPERIMENTAL PARASITOLOGY
Volume 133, Issue 3, Pages 327-333

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.exppara.2012.12.006

Keywords

Paramphistomosis; Paramphistomum cervi; Excretion-secretion fraction; Diagnostic antigen; SDS-PAGE; Immunoblotting; ELISA; Antigenic isolation

Categories

Funding

  1. Faculty of Science, Mahidol University
  2. Thailand Research Fund (Senior Research Scholar Fellowship)
  3. Thailand Research Fund, Commission on Higher Education
  4. Mahidol University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The immunogenic components of adult Paramphistomum cervi excretion-secretion (ES) fraction were revealed by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting technique using sera from cattle naturally infected with P. cervi, Fasciola gigantica, strongylids, Trichuris sp., and Strongyloides sp. By SDS-PAGE, it was found that the ES fraction comprised 13 distinct protein bands. Immunoblotting analysis of these proteins exhibited nine prominent antigenic bands which were recognized by paramphistomosis antisera. These antigenic proteins had molecular weights ranging from 10-170 kDa. One antigenic protein band of 40 kDa was found to give a consistent reaction with sera from all infected cattle. Its diagnostic sensitivity, specificity and accuracy using this test were 100%, 98.9% and 99.3%, respectively. The positive and negative predictive values were 98% and 100%, respectively. The 40 kDa antigen was partially purified by gel filtration and ion-exchange chromatography. The antigenicity of 40 kDa protein for diagnosis of P. cervi infection was confirmed by immunoblotting and indirect ELISA (at 1:78,125 dilution) using a pool of sera and individual serum samples from infected cattle. The present findings suggest that the 40 kDa protein may be used as a diagnostic antigen for paramphistomosis. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available